Labour Day message, unions are good

Unins benefit society so Canada’s workers can walk proudly on Labour Day.
Labour demonstration in Toronto, 2011. Dennis Gruending photo.

I first joined a union when I was nineteen years old. On my first day out of school for the summer, I traveled in my old Chevrolet to one of the potash mines under construction near Saskatoon. The man at the entrance gate told me that if I wanted to work there I would have to join one of the unions. I drove into the city, borrowed some money from my aunt, and went to the union hall to sign up. I was soon a member of the Construction and General Workers Union and working at the mine as a carpenter’s helper.

In the many years since, I have belonged to half a dozen unions and staff associations, including some now called by new names, such the United Food and Commercial Workers, Unifor, and the Canadian Media Guild. I was always pleased to have a union to negotiate salary and working conditions on my behalf with an employer who was more powerful than I was as an individual. That allowed me to concentrate on the work at hand and that was fine with me. In my last job, before I retreated to my study, I worked for the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), this country’s union central.

Good for communities 

While I was there the CLC’s researchers found that unionized workers earned more per hour than non-unionized workers, if only by a modest amount, and that was true in every province and territory. Being in a union was especially important for women and younger workers, who earned more than workers in non-unionized workplaces. It didn’t end there. Many of the benefits first achieved by unions for their members now apply to many other workers as well, including workplace safety standards, parental leaves, vacation pay and protection from discrimination and harassment.

But it’s not all about the individual workers. Unions are good for communities too because members spend their pay cheques at home. Cities and towns with more union members support a richer mix of businesses and services – everything from dentists to daycare. These services benefit everyone in the community.

Societal impact

Unions have a broader societal impact as well. They and their members were long-time advocates for Medicare, which was achieved in the 1960s. They were instrumental in pushing for the Canada Pension Plan and in recent improvements to it, which benefits every retired Canadian – whether or not they ever belonged to a union. For Labour Day in 2017 unions are launching a campaign calling for universal prescription drug coverage for all Canadians. Pharmaceuticals are the fastest growing cost component in health care, and the CLC says that 3.5 million Canadians can’t afford to fill their prescriptions.

All too often the image of unionized men and women is framed by a small, but influential group of corporate lobbyists. They claim that unions are greedy on behalf of their members and that they are always on strike. In fact, we are not talking about CEO-type salaries here but simply about living wages that will support families and communities. And strikes are rare. I was never once on strike in the 45 year span during which I belonged to one union or another – although I have walked the picket lines with people who felt that they had no alternative but to withdraw their labour.

Popes for unions 

It was more than 100 years ago that Pope Leo XIII issued a teaching document called an encyclical supporting the right of workers to create unions to protect their interests. The pope was shocked by the hardships and abuses spawned by the industrial revolution. Among the abuses today are those accompanying globalization, which has fostered an assault on wages, benefits and working conditions, along with environmental degradation  on a global scale.

The Atlantic, a U.S.-based magazine, recently published an article about the value of unions. The magazine was reacting to the populist anger which Donald Trump was able to marshal among disgruntled workers. Many of them once belonged to unions, but now only a small percentage do.  Those workers are now isolated and atomized and thus more susceptible to demagogic manipulation. “When unions work as they should, they serve important social functions,” says the article in The Atlantic. “[Unions] can smooth the jagged edges of globalization by giving workers bargaining power . . . Perhaps most important, they offer workers a way to be heard.”

I no longer belong to a union but I am proud to have done so.  Canada’s workers can walk with their heads up on Labour Day.

3 thoughts on “Labour Day message, unions are good

Add yours

  1. An excellent piece, Dennis.
    I’ll add my story. In 1947, my first job out of highschool was in a paving gang. The foreman, a nasty little man, had the habit when firing someone, of grabbing his shovel. The old geezers told us that during the ’30s there would be men lined four deep on the sidewalk, waiting for a job. When he fired someone the foreman would toss the shovel into the crowd; the man that came up with the shovel got the job.
    I decided that day that any job I got would be in a union.


  2. Dennis,
    I have belonged to unions for only 15 years in my working life.

    Unions had their beginnings about a hundred years ago, or so, because workers were expendable commodities, rather than vital human components in our society.

    Last month I visited Trail, BC, to learn of early treatment of metal workers more than a hundred years ago. The story is not pretty.

    May the future workers of Saskatchewan and Canada and elsewhere get due protection.
    Jake Buhler


  3. It’s extremely important that workers can belong to unions in order to guarantee safety in their workplaces and adequate salaries/wages to provide decent living conditions and health benefits. Unions also provide opportunities for workers to act on wider issues such as environmental and climate change. Currently, their efforts to convince the federal government to establish fair prices for drugs is urgent both because many people can’t afford the medicine they need and because Canada is the only country with a public health care system that doesn’t have a national program to cover the cost of drugs.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: