I read recently in The Guardian that trolls on social media are spreading fake news that the raging bush fires in Australia had been set by arsonists and are not linked to climate change. This is a claim that has been picked up and repeated by shifty ministers in the British government of Boris Johnson. This is fake news.
Another example: Prior to the Canadian election in 2019, there were stories circulating that Justin Trudeau had converted to Islam. They were false.
At about the same time, I had a rather heated discussion with someone who criticized Canadian media for reporting that in Syria the dictator Bashar al-Assad had used poison gas on his own population. Never happened, said my dinner partner and he referred me to some conspiracy theory websites and the RT, a Russian television network which regularly traffics in overt propaganda.
I could give many more such examples and no doubt you can too. There was a time, not so long ago, when many believed, along with Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg that information shared on social media would bring us all closer together. Not only that, but the web could also democratize the process of news gathering and dissemination. Anyone with a smart phone and an account on Facebook, or any number of other platforms, could be his or her own journalist, replacing the professional gatekeepers in traditional news media.
There has indeed been a quantum leap in the ability to communicate. But the new technologies have been seized upon by various bad actors to manipulate social media for their own ends, sewing the kind of fake news to which I referred above, and worse. I am thinking particularly of racists, white supremacists and climate change deniers, authoritarian regimes in China, Russia, Turkey, Burma and the Philippines, not to mention a certain American president.
Social media giants such as Facebook are allowing these tyrants to get away with it. In their pursuit of profit, companies such as Facebook have chosen not to engage in the kinds of news protocols and fact-checking which have long existed in traditional news media. These social media giants should be regulated in a manner which imposes upon them a measure of responsibility for the veracity of what appears on their platforms. European governments have begun to do that, but not so the U.S. and Canada.
There is only so much that we as individuals can do about regulating Facebook, but there certainly are things we can do to protect ourselves against false information and fake news.
I have a younger acquaintance who works as an editor for CBC News Network. In the wee hours of each morning he is at his desk contacting CBC journalists in the field; following what is being carried by other media; talking to far flung stringers about what they are seeing and hearing; watching video produced by those stringers or others and attempting to verify its accuracy. Only then does he choose video material and write accompanying copy for his hosts. After all of that, everything is double checked by senior producers and editors before it is broadcast.
Of course, the news media are far from perfect. I have no time for the editorials of the National Post. Yet in the main I trust the reporting and news protocols of our mainstream news outlets. They deal in facts and they do fact checking.
When the CBC, the Globe and Mail, Maclean’s magazine, Huffington Post or (further abroad) the New York Times or the BBC tells us that in Syria the dictator Bashar al-Assad is using poison gas on his own population, I believe them. I am immediately sceptical when acquaintances point me to information they have seen on their social media feeds by sources who are either blatant propagandists or whose existence is shrouded in secrecy.
My news diet doesn’t end with the mainstream media because they are generally far too conservative in their orientation. For a more left-of-centre perspective, I follow on line outlets such as Rabble.ca (to which I occasionally contribute), The Tyee, and National Observer, which is especially good on environmental issues. Farther afield, I like The Guardian from Great Britain which carried the story above about fake news and the Australian bush fires.
The most important thing is to choose a few trusted news sources for information about what is going on in the world. Watch them with a critical eye, of course, but stay with them.
Good evening Dennis. Thanks for pointing out the many ways that false media attempts to influence our understanding of events around the world. Many people fall into the trap of false media and begin to respond in ways that only increases false responses on their part. Regards, Frances
Its important to remember that photos and video purporting to be of contemporary events may also be fake news. There are also instances where the video and/or photos are real but the labelling is fake news. The multiplication of news sources has increased our chances of knowing what is happening around the world but it has also increased our chances of being misled.
Thanks Allan. I agree. And I know, for example, that my younger friend at CBC TV spends a good deal of his time verifying the authenticity of the videos which they are being offered. But it’s not always easy to know what is accurate. There’s an irony here. Many news outlets now spend a good deal of time and coin trying to fact check the veracity of social media feeds. The giant companies on which those feeds appear have been reluctant to take any responsibility for fact checking on their own material — but rather leave they that task to the news outlets who the social media giants have been driving out of business.